Sean,
Wow! I have found the audacity of SOME people regarding this amazing news to be embarassing. <md..
You may have seen the various posts I have made in yours' and Matt defence. Hang in there, dude! If you read thru the BS, there are many of us that love and appreciated the work BOTH of you have done! Where is the world coming to that people bi*ch about a free damn lunch!
Work is of course appreciated, but as someone who spends a lot of time working voluntarily on open source projects, some of them quite large, certain community standards have to be observed. This means respecting the license chosen by the original copyright holder - which wasn't done. Sean has added this now (You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login), so that is cool.
Open source != free lunch/public domain, I'm sorry - equating those is just ignorant of the facts. I don't expect the users on this forum to understand the complexities of open software development - but don't speak authoritatively about which you are not informed.
There is also a less formal "credit where credit is due" meritocracy in open source. There was a whole lot of "I" in the 3.0 announcement, and not one single "we". Where as if you look at the code in the "nutcracker" 3 repository it is 99% written by Matt. Sure the algorithms are ported from Sean's version, but the implementation is original, and often improved over Sean's PHP work. As a fellow developer, I just was enquiring as to Matt's participation in this release, as it did not appear as a joint announcement.
I'm not out to accuse Sean of being evil - anyone who chooses to release their stuff as open source gets a big pat on the back from me, and the effort spent on not just writing the software, but supporting it is admirable. But these melodramatic responses to my request for clarification are a tad off-base.
Regards,
-P