Author Topic: For those using Waterproof connectors rather than RJ-45  (Read 1469 times)

DanHouston

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 499
    • View Profile
For those using Waterproof connectors rather than RJ-45
« on: January 08, 2015, 11:31:58 pm »
Do you still use ethernet cable and solder on the connector or are you using something else?
2011 - Year #1
    4000 lights and 16 channels
    5 Songs sequenced
2012 - Year #2
    5000 lights and 123 channels
    8 Songs sequenced

loveroflife96

  • Coop Manager
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 439
  • Brandon Christmas 2010
    • View Profile
    • My Christmas Display Website
Re: For those using Waterproof connectors rather than RJ-45
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2015, 12:07:34 am »
For this past year, I did use Cat5 cable and strip and connected the waterproof connector which was pretty time consuming.  This year I'm planning to just order some 5 ft extension connectors from Ray and cut them off and use them instead of creating my own.  Might even see if he'll do it for me!  He's usually VERY economical on custom items, but it does take longer to get your order.

Duane

Steve Gase

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2915
    • View Profile
    • WinterLightShow in Georgetown, TX
Re: For those using Waterproof connectors rather than RJ-45
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2015, 12:43:04 am »

For SSCs (pixelnet) I use ethernet (cat5) cables, cut off one plug and replace it with a 4-core waterproof connector.

To join the waterproof connector I solder the wires, and use shrink tube over each connection -- and a larger shrink tube over the entire splice.  I use the wiring scheme described in the wiki for 4-core powered pixelnet.

I keep one rj45 plug to continue using the jacks on the hubs.

the big reason is for the cat5 is the twisted pair to have the long distance between hub and controller. 

most of my cables are 25ft in length since they are the original cables that I purchased 4 years ago for SSC.  I have also made some "cat5 extensions" with both male and female waterproof connectors when my standard 25ft cables are not long enough...  they fit between the 25ft rj45/4-core wore and the controller.

In the first year I had water problems with the cat5 and my connectors were damaged on one end, so it made sense to cut them off.

I do use 5ft 3-core cables from ray ON THE CONTROLLER TO PIXEL connection because the twisted pair is not needed... there is a single data wire, not a pair of pixelnet + and - wires... so there is not extended distance. 

Also, I limit the 3-core cables to 5ft because of the max distance between controller and first pixel.
« Last Edit: January 09, 2015, 12:51:49 am by Steve Gase »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

DanHouston

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 499
    • View Profile
Re: For those using Waterproof connectors rather than RJ-45
« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2015, 03:26:54 pm »
Thanks guys!
2011 - Year #1
    4000 lights and 16 channels
    5 Songs sequenced
2012 - Year #2
    5000 lights and 123 channels
    8 Songs sequenced